FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Aggressive Campaign Metaphors Boost Or Bust Voter Turnout—Depends On Your Personality

Survey Experimentsvoter mobilizationpersonality traitsaggressive metaphorsVoting and Elections@PSR&M6 Stata files2 datasetsDataverse
Voting and Elections subfield banner

Campaigns often use aggressive metaphors to motivate voters. This research shows these messages have different effects based on voter personality traits. Two US survey experiments reveal a key pattern: aggressive language mobilizes voters high in aggression but demobilizes those low in it. For instance, strong partisans with high aggression were energized by such metaphors while their less aggressive counterparts felt disengaged. This finding highlights two things: first, how powerful metaphor choice can be; second, the overlooked role of personality in political engagement—even nonviolent forms like voting. The implications are significant for understanding campaign effectiveness and voter behavior.

Article card for article: Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors
Mobilizing Voters with Aggressive Metaphors was authored by Nathan Kalmoe. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods