FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Inequality Preferences Reveal Hidden Disagreement

United Statesideal pay ratiosanchoring effectratio biasPolitical Behavior@PSR&M4 Stata filesDataverse
Political Behavior subfield banner

New survey data from 40 countries and experiments in the US challenge

> Descriptive Representation

* A widely used cross-national measure of ideal inequality (Ideal Pay Ratios) masks deep public disagreement.

* This apparent agreement stems largely from perceptual biases: anchoring effect and ratio bias.

* These cognitive distortions overshadow political predispositions in shaping perceived inequality levels.

> Attitudinal Measurement

The study shows how standard survey methods yield misleading results about economic preferences.

Article card for article: Attitudes toward Economic Inequality: The Illusory Agreement
Attitudes toward Economic Inequality: The Illusory Agreement was authored by Rasmus T. Pedersen and Diana Mutz. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods