FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Mass Shootings Don't Boost Gun Control Support? New Study Challenges Assumption

Critical EventsGun Control SupportMass ShootingsUS AdultsAmerican PoliticsPSR&M1 R file1 Stata file4 datasetsDataverse

Mass shootings are often expected to change public opinion on gun control. However, this is not always the case.

📊 Event Analysis: We assessed shifts in support following the Sandy Hook tragedy using a national panel survey of US adults collected immediately after the event.

🔍 Key Findings: Data shows no significant increase in gun control backing across political or demographic groups post-Sandy Hook. There's also no evidence of attitude polarization — citizens didn't react more strongly to negative events than positive ones, but they still showed signs of motivated reasoning when interpreting them.

💡 Why It Matters: This suggests that the public may be resistant to change due to elite polarization and pre-existing beliefs rather than being swayed by crises.

Critical Events and Attitude Change: Support for Gun Control After Mass Shootings was authored by Jon Rogowski and Patrick Tucker. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
data