FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Mass Shootings Don't Boost Gun Control Support? New Study Challenges Assumption

critical eventsgun control supportmass shootingsUS adultsAmerican Politics@PSR&M1 R file1 Stata file4 datasetsDataverse
American Politics subfield banner

Mass shootings are often expected to change public opinion on gun control. However, this is not always the case.

📊 Event Analysis: We assessed shifts in support following the Sandy Hook tragedy using a national panel survey of US adults collected immediately after the event.

🔍 Key Findings: Data shows no significant increase in gun control backing across political or demographic groups post-Sandy Hook. There's also no evidence of attitude polarization — citizens didn't react more strongly to negative events than positive ones, but they still showed signs of motivated reasoning when interpreting them.

💡 Why It Matters: This suggests that the public may be resistant to change due to elite polarization and pre-existing beliefs rather than being swayed by crises.

Article card for article: Critical Events and Attitude Change: Support for Gun Control After Mass Shootings
Critical Events and Attitude Change: Support for Gun Control After Mass Shootings was authored by Jon Rogowski and Patrick Tucker. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods