
Why Media Exposure Matters
This article by Jay C. Kao and Jay Chieh Kao investigates whether and how pro‑Beijing media affect voters. The question speaks to broader debates in political communication and electoral influence: can partisan or state‑aligned media change political attitudes and voting behavior when exposure is manipulated experimentally?
What the Authors Did
Kao and Kao use a randomized field experiment to estimate the causal impact of exposure to pro‑Beijing media on citizens' political views and reported voting preferences. The project pairs a real‑world intervention with rigorous random assignment to isolate media effects from confounding factors that typically plague observational studies of media and politics.
How the Experiment Worked
What the Paper Reports
The article presents causal estimates of how pro‑Beijing media exposure moves voter attitudes and reported voting choices. Detailed statistical analyses, robustness checks, and the accompanying replication materials document the study's design and results; readers can consult the replication files for exact estimates, confidence intervals, and model specifications.
Why Readers Should Care
By combining a field experiment with open replication materials, the study offers credible evidence about media influence in a politically salient context. Its design and transparency make it a useful reference for scholars and policymakers interested in media effects, electoral integrity, and the role of partisan or state‑aligned outlets in shaping democratic outcomes.

| How the Pro-Beijing Media Influences Voters: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment was authored by Jay C. Kao and Jay Chieh Kao. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 2026. |