
Why This Study Matters
Sven Hegewald and Dominik Schraff investigate whether the widening political differences between cities and the countryside extend beyond preferences and voting into emotional distance—what they call place-based affective polarization. Clarifying whether place identity and resentment produce social hostility as well as policy divides matters for understanding party realignment and social cohesion in contemporary Europe.
What They Measured
Place-based affective polarization is defined as the gap between in-group and out-group affect toward people from one’s own type of place (urban or rural). The authors pair this affect measure with indicators of place-based resentment, place identity, and respondents’ party-family preferences to assess how emotions about place relate to political choice.
How the Study Was Done
The analysis draws on original survey data from nine European countries. Respondents’ feelings toward urban and rural populations were scored to calculate in-group versus out-group affect; those scores were then compared across respondents and linked to self-reported support for party families, distinguishing GAL (green, alternative, libertarian) and TAN (traditional, authoritarian, nationalist) affiliations.
Key Findings
The authors treat these associations as correlational rather than causal.
Implications for European Politics
Emotional divisions tied to where people live appear to map onto distinct party-family preferences, indicating that urban–rural identity can help organize contemporary political cleavages and may reinforce partisan sorting across European contexts.

| Is the Urban-Rural Divide Affectively Polarised? Comparative Evidence From Nine European Countries was authored by Sven Hegewald and Dominik Schraff. It was published by Sage in CPS in 2025. |