
Why This Matters
Residential mobility is a common life event, but its political consequences for local democracy are underexplored. Hans Lueders asks whether moving homes weakens how people engage with local government and community life—an issue that matters for local accountability, turnout, and civic infrastructure.
The Question and Theory
Lueders investigates whether residential moves change movers' political engagement, and why. The paper argues that moves erode attachments to place, reduce knowledge of local political contexts, and disrupt social ties that sustain participation—mechanisms expected to depress local engagement but not necessarily national political involvement.
Data and Design
The study uses two complementary German sources. First, longitudinal German household panel data track individuals over time and allow within-person comparisons before and after moves. Second, comprehensive administrative records covering all moves in Germany test whether changes in local context (for example, moving to a very different neighborhood) could explain any behavioral shifts. This combination isolates short-term changes associated with moving and tests alternative explanations.
Key Findings
Implications for Local Democracy
These results suggest that residential mobility can weaken citizens’ ties to local politics even when it does not change their national political behaviors. By documenting a mechanism tied to place attachment, local knowledge, and social disruption, the paper highlights a structural challenge for maintaining sustained local civic engagement in mobile societies.
Contribution
By focusing on Germany and combining panel survey evidence with nation-wide administrative move records, Lueders extends mobility research beyond the U.S.-centered literature and shifts attention from partisanship to local democratic accountability.

| The Local Costs of Moving: How Residential Moves Weaken Local Engagement was authored by Hans Lueders. It was published by Sage in CPS in 2025. |