FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

When Mini-Publics Aren't Representative, Their Legitimacy Gains Vanish

Political Behavior subfield banner

Why This Question Matters: Many advocates promote deliberative mini-publics—small, randomly selected groups that advise or decide on public issues—as a way to boost democratic legitimacy. Micha Germann asks whether the real-world limits of representativeness (small sample sizes and non-response biases) weaken the public credibility of these bodies.

What the Study Tests: Germann reports a pre-registered survey experiment (N = 1,308) that evaluates how deviations from statistical representativeness affect citizens' legitimacy beliefs. The central outcome is perceived process legitimacy: how fair, inclusive, and authoritative respondents view a decision-making process that involves a mini-public.

How the Experiment Works: Respondents completed a survey experiment in which the presence of a mini-public and the degree of its statistical representativeness were systematically varied. The design isolates whether the involvement of a mini-public raises legitimacy perceptions and how sensitive that effect is to small versus large composition biases that mimic nonresponse and small-sample noise.

Key Findings:

  • The inclusion of a randomly selected mini-public substantially increases perceived process legitimacy compared to decision-making without one, aligning with prior work.
  • Even modest departures from representativeness—small demographic imbalances—substantially reduce these legitimacy gains.
  • Larger representativeness biases can eliminate the legitimacy advantage altogether: when mini-publics appear clearly unrepresentative, respondents do not view decisions as more legitimate.

What This Means for Reformers: The results temper hopes that mini-publics are an easy fix for legitimacy shortfalls. The legitimacy payoff depends critically on credible representativeness; small-sample variability and nonresponse can undercut public confidence. Practitioners should therefore prioritize sampling procedures, participation incentives, and transparent communication to sustain the perceived fairness and authority of mini-publics.

Article card for article: Mini-Publics, (Lack of) Representativeness, and Legitimacy Beliefs
Mini-Publics, (Lack of) Representativeness, and Legitimacy Beliefs was authored by Micha Germann. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2025.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
British Journal of Political Science