
Why This Study?
Trust in election outcomes has become increasingly politicized in the United States, raising concerns about the stability of democratic processes and peaceful transfers of power. Jennifer Gaudette, Seth J. Hill, Thad Kousser, Mackenzie Lockhart, and Mindy Romero ask whether communications from election officials can overcome partisan divisions and rebuild confidence in election administration.
Where and How They Tested It
The authors partnered with local and state election officials in Los Angeles County, Colorado, Georgia, and Texas to run large-scale messaging experiments just after the 2022 U.S. midterm elections. Nearly 8,500 American respondents were exposed to short (about 30-second) official video messages or informational videos explaining election protections. The design compares recipients’ trust in their own state’s elections and in elections more broadly, and measures effects relative to pre-existing partisan differences.
What They Found
Implications for Democratic Trust
These results show that trusted election administrators can play an active role in restoring confidence in electoral processes. Short, factual messages from official sources produced measurable improvements in trust, even amid strong partisan polarization. The findings point to a practical tool—targeted official communication—that may help safeguard the legitimacy of elections and the norms surrounding peaceful power transitions.

| Can Official Messaging on Trust in Elections Break Through Partisan Polarization? was authored by Jennifer Gaudette, Seth J Hill, Thad Kousser, Mackenzie Lockhart and Mindy Romero. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2025. |