
Why Inflation Mattered in the 2022 Midterms?
Leonardo Baccini and Stephen Weymouth investigate how rising prices influenced voter choices during the 2022 U.S. congressional elections. With inflation re-emerging as a dominant economic concern, the authors ask whether personal exposure to price increases shifted support toward Republicans and how competing partisan narratives about the causes of inflation affected those attitudes.
How the Authors Studied Voter Responses
The paper reports a pre-registered national survey with an embedded experiment conducted in the run-up to the 2022 midterms. Respondents reported their personal inflation burden (their subjective experience of rising prices). In the experimental component, participants were randomly exposed to one of two partisan frames: a Republican-style message attributing inflation to government spending, or a Democratic-style message blaming corporate greed. Random assignment of these messages allows the study to identify causal effects of framing on attitudes about parties and inflation management.
Key Findings
Why This Matters
This study links subjective economic hardship to vote choice and demonstrates that partisan messaging about causes of economic problems can change electoral evaluations. The findings speak to debates in voting and elections about accountability and attribution: parties can shape whether voters punish incumbents or shift support based on whom they hold responsible for economic pain. The pre-registered experimental design strengthens the claim that framing, not just objective conditions, helps determine the electoral consequences of inflation.

| Inflation, Blame Attribution, and the 2022 US Congressional Elections was authored by Leonardo Baccini and Stephen Weymouth. It was published by Cambridge in BJPS in 2025. |