FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Reputational Concerns: Do Voters Spot Media Bias in Government Coverage?

reputational concernsmedia biasgovernment competencevotersPolitical Theory@PSR&MDataverse
Political Theory subfield banner

The public relies on the media to gauge government competence. This paper questions whether voters can truly distinguish between honest reporting and 'yes-man' coverage.

Finding:

Media outlets typically avoid criticizing governments due to reputational concerns.

Conditions for Truthful Reporting:*

* Low expected government competence;

* High probability of alternative information sources reaching voters.

Otherwise, Pandering Occurs:

Even reputable media may pander when these conditions aren't met. This effect is pronounced in lower-quality outlets.

Key Insight:

The 'yes-man' problem arises even without overt policy bias or capture.

Article card for article: Media with Reputational Concerns: Yes Men or Watchdogs?
Media with Reputational Concerns: Yes Men or Watchdogs? was authored by Greg Chih-Hsin Sheen. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods