FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Reputational Concerns: Do Voters Spot Media Bias in Government Coverage?

Political Theory subfield banner

The public relies on the media to gauge government competence. This paper questions whether voters can truly distinguish between honest reporting and 'yes-man' coverage.

Finding:

Media outlets typically avoid criticizing governments due to reputational concerns.

Conditions for Truthful Reporting:*

* Low expected government competence;

* High probability of alternative information sources reaching voters.

Otherwise, Pandering Occurs:

Even reputable media may pander when these conditions aren't met. This effect is pronounced in lower-quality outlets.

Key Insight:

The 'yes-man' problem arises even without overt policy bias or capture.

Article card for article: Media with Reputational Concerns: Yes Men or Watchdogs?
Media with Reputational Concerns: Yes Men or Watchdogs? was authored by Greg Chih-Hsin Sheen. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods