FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Surprising Media Bias in Election Coverage: How Issue Ownership Skews Negativity

Campaign NegativityAustria ElectionIssue Ownership BiasGERGM AnalysisVoting and Elections@PSR&M2 R files3 datasetsDataverse
Voting and Elections subfield banner

Campaign negativity is common in multi-party elections. This study examines Austrian media coverage during the 2013 national election.

Data & Methods:

Analyzed news content using Generalized Exponential Random Graph Models (GERGM). Controlled for non-mediated negativity.

Key Findings:

Media disproportionately cover attacks from and against issue owners. This pattern holds across different policy domains.

Why It Matters?

This suggests media representations often violate the normative ideal of fair coverage in multi-party systems. The findings highlight a systematic bias that could influence public perception.

Article card for article: Disproportionality in Media Representations of Campaign Negativity
Disproportionality in Media Representations of Campaign Negativity was authored by Dominic Nyhuis, Hyunjin Song and Hajo Boomgaarden. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods