FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Greater Public Confidence in US Supreme Court Predicts More Congressional Jurisdiction Limiting

judicial politicsinstitutional interactionLaw Courts Justice@PSR&M3 Stata files9 datasetsDataverse
Law Courts Justice subfield banner

This study explores the relationship between American confidence in the U.S. Supreme Court and Congress's actions to strip its jurisdiction.

Background: Prior research connects public support for SCOTUS with both judicial independence and congressional efforts to curtail federal courts' power, suggesting these are linked primarily through workload concerns rather than ideological conflicts.

New Findings: Contrary to previous studies, our analysis reveals a positive correlation: higher public confidence in the Court actually predicts more jurisdiction-stripping legislation by Congress.

Implications: This counterintuitive result challenges existing assumptions about how court-public opinion dynamics influence legislative behavior and underscores the need for further investigation into these complex interactions.

Article card for article: Greater Public Confidence in the United States Supreme Court Predicts More Jurisdiction Stripping
Greater Public Confidence in the United States Supreme Court Predicts More Jurisdiction Stripping was authored by Joseph Ura and Patrick Wohlfarth. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Political Science Research & Methods