FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why Doesn't More Time Make MSNBC Seem Fair? For Democrats Yes, for Republicans No

American Politics subfield banner

New findings challenge simplistic views of partisan media consumption.

The Setup

This study improves upon previous research by using a week-long online news portal with randomly assigned feeds that feature either in-party or out-party media outlets.

What We Found

• Sustained exposure to out-party news (Fox News for Democrats) reduced perceptions of unfairness toward the opposing outlet.

• This effect was not observed when Democrats repeatedly consumed MSNBC, their own party's outlet.

• In contrast, repeated exposure to in-party news increased Republican beliefs that Fox News is unfair.

So What?

These results update our understanding of how partisan media consumption operates beyond short-term experiments. They suggest the online news environment has more complex effects on political perceptions than previously thought.

Article card for article: Partisan Media Effects Beyond One-Shot Experimental Designs
Partisan Media Effects Beyond One-Shot Experimental Designs was authored by Joshua Darr, Kathleen Searles, Brian Watson, Raymond Pingree, Nathan Kalmoe and Mingxiao Sui. It was published by Cambridge in PSR&M in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Science Research & Methods
Edit article record marker