
💡 What Happened and Why It Matters
The 2016 Indian demonetization instantly rendered 86% of cash in circulation illegal tender, with new notes introduced gradually over the following months. A model is presented in which agents hold cash both to meet a cash-in-advance constraint and to facilitate tax evasion; the model generates testable predictions about the real and financial effects of a sudden cash shortage.
📊 How Causal Effects Are Identified and Measured
The event is analyzed as a large-scale natural experiment using cross-sectional variation across Indian districts. Identification relies on the geographic distribution of demonetized notes and the staggered rollout of new notes. Multiple novel data sources are combined to measure real and financial activity:
🔎 Key Findings
Taken together, the cross-sectional responses cumulate to a measurable aggregate effect in 2016Q4: a contraction of at least 2 percentage points in employment and night-lights–based output attributable to the cash shortage, and a roughly 2 percentage point reduction in bank credit relative to counterfactual paths. The estimated effects dissipate over the subsequent months.
⚖️ Broader Implication
The analysis rejects monetary neutrality in this large-scale natural experiment, providing rare causal evidence that a sudden contraction in usable cash can have short-run real effects on output, employment, payment technology adoption, and bank credit.

| Cash and the Economy: Evidence from India's Demonetization was authored by Gabriel Chodorow-Reich, Gita Gopinath, Prachi Mishra and Abhinav Narayanan. It was published by Oxford in Q.J. Econ. in 2020. |
