NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Multicollinearity Mess-Up? Don't Drop Your Variables!

State politics research frequently involves correlated variables. This article examines multicollinearity (MC) using simulated data to reveal its hidden dangers and how simply dropping variables introduces bias.

Understanding MC Issues

The problem of highly related explanatory variables is often misunderstood, leading researchers astray when attempting to isolate effects in regression models.

Better Solutions Than Omission

Contrary to common practice, the article argues that omitting correlated variables isn't justifiable. Instead, alternative approaches should be considered.

MC and Interaction Terms

The analysis extends to multiplicative interaction models—a key area where MC is often mistakenly addressed by variable removal.

Using legislative initiatives as a concrete example of policy responsiveness research illustrates these crucial points.

Researchers face clear challenges when dealing with MC. This paper offers practical guidance on navigating this statistical pitfall.

State Politics & Policy Quarterly
What to Do (and Not Do) with Multicollinearity in State Politics Research was authored by Kevin Arceneaux and Gregory Huber. It was published in SPPQ in 2007. Find on Google Scholar10.1177/153244000700700105
Methodology subfield banner