FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Direct Democracy Doesn't Change How Public Opinion and Policy Align in States

Direct DemocracyState Policy LiberalismOrganized InterestsCongruenceAmerican PoliticsSPPQDataverse
Subfield banner image

This study examines how initiatives affect state public policy congruence.

Using Erikson et al.'s opinion liberalism model expanded by Gray et al.,

the research explores the interaction between public opinion, organized interests,

and direct democracy mechanisms across U.S. states.

🔍 Data & Methods

We analyze variance in predictors of state policy liberalism using multiple models

while distinguishing between initiative and non-initiative states.

📊 Findings

Our results indicate that initiatives do not fundamentally alter the congruence

between public opinion and state policies, contrary to some theoretical expectations.

💡 Implications

These findings suggest direct democracy mechanisms may not significantly change

the relationship between citizen preferences and policy outcomes in U.S. states.

Article Card
Public Opinion, Organized Interests, and Policy Congruence in Initiative and Noninitiative U.S. States was authored by James Monogan, Virginia Gray and David Lowery. It was published by Sage in SPPQ in 2009.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
State Politics & Policy Quarterly
Edit article record marker