
Why Survey Measurement Matters
Wijbrandt van Schuur addresses a common challenge in survey-based political research: how to measure an underlying ordinal trait (for example, attitudes or values) with multiple items when strict parametric assumptions may not hold. The article revisits the Guttman tradition and places Mokken scale analysis as a probabilistic, nonparametric alternative grounded in Item Response Theory (IRT).
What Mokken Scaling Is
Mokken scaling is presented as an ordinal, unidimensional measurement framework built on two nonparametric models: Monotone Homogeneity and Double Monotonicity. These models relax the stronger distributional and functional-form assumptions of parametric IRT (notably the Rasch/one-parameter logistic model) while retaining probabilistic interpretations of item ordering and respondent latent traits.
How the Article Compares Methods
Empirical Illustration
What This Means for Political and Survey Researchers
Mokken scale analysis provides a practical middle ground: it keeps the conceptual strengths of IRT (latent traits, item ordering) but imposes fewer parametric constraints than models like Rasch. For political scientists working with ordinal survey data—especially public-opinion and values measures—Mokken methods offer a transparent, assumption-light toolkit for scale development and validation that complements both factor analysis and parametric IRT approaches.

| Mokken Scale Analysis: A Nonparametric Version of Guttman Scaling for Survey Research was authored by Wijbrandt van Schuur. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2003. |