
🔎 Why measurement bias matters
Many social-science concepts are latent and observed only through indicators. When an external variable of interest directly affects those indicators, estimates of its relationship with the latent trait become biased. These violations of measurement invariance can, for example, confound true cross-country differences in postmaterialism with differences in how questions are interpreted.
🧭 What this paper does
Extends the recently introduced EPC-interest (an expected-parameter-change measure for sensitivity analysis) from continuous-data latent variable models to models that use categorical indicators. The extension makes it possible to quantify how much direct effects of an external variable on categorical indicators would alter the estimated relationship between that variable and the latent construct.
🛠️ How the extension works
📋 Demonstrations with real data
💡 Why it matters
The extension equips researchers who use categorical indicators with a principled sensitivity-analysis method to:

| Evaluating Measurement Invariance in Categorical Data Latent Variable Models With the EPC-interest was authored by Daniel L. Oberski, Jeroen K. Vermunt and Guy B. D. Moors. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2015. |
