FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Why Fixed-Effects Models Can Make Estimates More Biased Than OLS

Fixed Effectsdynamic misspecificationHausman testomitted variablesPanel DataMethodology@Pol. An.3 Stata filesDataverse
Methodology subfield banner

🔍 Main Claim:

The fixed-effects estimator is not benign. It is biased when the model's dynamics are misspecified and when omitted within-unit variation is correlated with a regressor. Moreover, fixed effects can amplify bias from dynamic misspecification and—when omitted time-invariant variables coexist with dynamic misspecification—can be more biased than a naive OLS model.

🧭 How the argument is demonstrated:

Formal argumentation and demonstrations show how different forms of misspecification interact to produce bias. The analysis focuses on two common problems:

  • dynamic misspecification (incorrect treatment of time dependence), and
  • omitted variables that are either time-invariant or vary over time and correlate with regressors.

📌 Key findings:

  • The fixed-effects estimator is biased in the presence of dynamic misspecification and omitted within-unit variation correlated with a regressor.
  • Fixed effects can amplify the bias introduced by dynamic misspecification.
  • When omitted time-invariant variables and dynamic misspecifications are both present, fixed effects can be more biased than naive OLS.
  • The Hausman test does not reliably identify the least-biased estimator when time-invariant and time-varying omitted variables or dynamic misspecifications exist.

🔎 Implications for applied researchers:

  • Do not treat the fixed-effects estimator as a default remedy for omitted variables without a convincing case that dynamics are correctly specified.
  • Avoid relying on the Hausman test alone for model selection under these types of misspecification.
  • Greater attention should be paid to modeling dynamics appropriately before adopting fixed effects to absorb potentially omitted constant effects.

📣 Call to methodologists:

These results caution against simplistic defaults and invite further study of estimator properties under multiple simultaneous misspecifications. More methodological work is needed on how estimators behave when dynamics and omitted-variable structures are both uncertain.

Article card for article: Not So Harmless After All: The Fixed-Effects Model
Not So Harmless After All: The Fixed-Effects Model was authored by Vera Troeger and Thomas Pluemper. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Political Analysis
Edit article record marker