
🔍 Problem Identified:
Measurement error undermines survey validity, particularly for sensitive questions. List experiments reduce deliberate misreporting but remain vulnerable to nonstrategic measurement error from poor implementation and respondent inattention. Such error violates the assumptions of the standard maximum likelihood regression (MLreg) estimator and can produce misleading inferences—especially when the sensitive trait is rare.
📊 How the paper evaluates robustness and detection:
🛠️ How measurement error is addressed directly:
📁 Empirical checks and practical tools:
💻 Implementation:
Why it matters: The suite of diagnostic tests and estimation tools allows researchers to detect when list experiments are compromised by inattentive or flawed implementation, to choose estimators that remain valid in those settings, and to recover more reliable estimates—critical when the target trait is rare and the risk of bias is greatest.

| List Experiments With Measurement Error was authored by Graeme Blair, Winston Chou and Kosuke Imai. It was published by Cambridge in Pol. An. in 2019. |
