
🧭 Main Argument
This essay develops a theory of strategic legislative agenda control showing that a single party can effectively set the agenda under majoritarian gatekeeping rules without holding a majority—or even a plurality—of seats. The agenda-setting party need not be the median party in the assembly and does not require support from executive-led parliamentary coalitions to do so.
📍 Where This Happens: Mexico's Chamber of Deputies
The Mexican Chamber of Deputies serves as the case study illustrating how institutional rules and political context create conditions for one-party-led agenda-setting in a fragmented congress. The Partido Revolucionario Institucional (PRI) demonstrates that the failure of opposition coalitions to roll the PRI reflects the party's ability to set the agenda through strategic coalition formation since 2000.
📊 How Evidence Was Assembled
🔑 Key Findings
📌 Why It Matters
This argument reframes expectations about who can control legislative agendas in fragmented parliaments: institutional gatekeeping and strategic coalition formation can substitute for numerical dominance. The findings have implications for theories of agenda-setting, coalition politics, and how legislative institutions shape power in multiparty systems.

| Strategic Coalitions and Agenda-setting in Fragmented Congresses: How the Pri Sets the Legislative Agenda in Mexico was authored by Robert D. Knight. It was published by in BPSR in 2018. |