FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | Int'l Relations | Law & Courts
   FIND DATA: By Author | Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).
Can the Party in Power Systematically Win Majority Seats Even When Elections Are Close? New Findings from US State Assemblies
Insights from the Field
Political Parties
Close Elections
U.S.
State Assemblies
Voting and Elections
JOP
2 Stata files
3 text files
2 other files
12 datasets
Dataverse
Can the Party in Power Systematically Win a Majority in Close Legislative Elections? Evidence from U.S. State Assemblies was authored by Ajay Shenoy and Dahyeon Jeong. It was published by Chicago in JOP in 2022.

Political parties governing during closely contested legislative elections may strategically time their campaigns to maximize gains. This study examines whether these parties can systematically win majority seats despite electoral closeness.

### Research Question

How do political parties in power perform when facing close legislative elections?

### Methodology & Findings

Using comprehensive data from US state assemblies over multiple election cycles, we analyze patterns of seat wins across diverse scenarios. The analysis reveals that ruling parties demonstrate a consistent ability to convert closely contested districts into majority seats.

### Key Insights

• Legislative elections can be strategically manipulated by governing parties even when statistically competitive

• Campaign timing and resource allocation play crucial roles in these outcomes

• These findings challenge conventional assumptions about close electoral competition

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Chicago Press
Journal of Politics
Podcast host Ryan