FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Minority Visibility in Advanced Democracies: The Persistent Underrepresentation of LGBTQ Candidates

Insights from the Field
Descriptive Representation
LGBTQ+
Advanced Democracies
Candidate Selection
Regression Analysis
Voting and Elections
JOP
3 R files
3 datasets
Dataverse
Voter Preferences and the Political Underrepresentation of Minority Groups: Lesbian, Gay, and Transgender Candidates in Advanced Democracies was authored by Gabriele Magni and Andrew Reynolds. It was published by Chicago in JOP in 2021.

This article examines voter preferences regarding political representation, specifically analyzing underrepresentation within advanced democracies.

Key Question: Why do minority groups like lesbians, gays, and transgender individuals remain politically underrepresented despite the prevalence of inclusive electoral systems? Using data from fifteen countries across Europe and North America drawn primarily from election databases and party lists (e.g., European Election Database, US Congressional Elections), it explores whether voter support for LGBTQ candidates translates into their political visibility. The findings reveal that while voters express some level of support, structural barriers within political party selection mechanisms largely suppress the representation of these groups.

Data & Methods:

The study utilizes a comparative analysis framework examining election results across multiple periods and parties in fifteen advanced democracies (including Germany, Canada, France). Data sources include official voter registration data, campaign material archives (e.g., LGBTQ Victory Institute), and party platform documents. The research employs quantitative content analysis alongside statistical modeling using regression discontinuity designs.

Key Findings:

The results indicate that despite explicit public support for representation in some cases, structural barriers within political institutions significantly limit the electoral success of LGBTQ candidates. Candidate selection committees show a measurable bias against openly LGBTQ individuals seeking party nominations, even when voter sentiment appears favorable.

Why It Matters:

This research demonstrates how democratic ideals can clash with practical realities regarding minority representation. The findings offer crucial insights into designing more equitable political systems that genuinely reflect their diverse populations.

data
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Chicago Press
Journal of Politics
Podcast host Ryan