
🔎 The Problem: GDP Masks What States Can Use for Arms
Scholars routinely use gross domestic product (GDP) as a proxy for the income states can devote to arming, but this approach systematically mismeasures power resources. GDP conflates two conceptually distinct forms of income into one additive indicator: subsistence income (the "bread" needed to cover basic population needs) and surplus income (the remaining resources that could be allocated to "guns" or "butter").
📊 What the New Measure Does: Surplus Domestic Product (SDP)
Surplus Domestic Product (SDP) corrects this measurement error by decomposing subsistence income and surplus income from total GDP. SDP isolates the portion of national income that is available for discretionary allocations—such as military spending—rather than treating all GDP as equally fungible for arming.
📑 How SDP Was Evaluated: Validation Exercises and Empirical Models
✅ Key Findings
💡 Why It Matters
Better measurement of available income changes inferences about armament and state behavior. By separating "bread" from "guns or butter," SDP clarifies the resource basis for military burdens and offers a more reliable foundation for research and policy analysis on power, defense spending, and state priorities.

| Bread Before Guns or Butter: Introducing Surplus Domestic Product was authored by Therese Anders, Jonathan N. Markowitz and Christopher J. Fariss. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2020. |
