New research reveals an unexpected strategic dimension in rulings at Germany's highest court.

Study Focus:

* Examines the use of delay tactics by judges when handling constitutional cases.

* Analyzes instances where rulings were strategically postponed despite legal precedent.

Key Findings:

* Contrary to expectations, deliberate delays were shown to align with political calculations in specific contexts.

* This timing strategy appears linked to managing public perception and broader political implications.

* The analysis demonstrates a calculated use of procedural timeframes by judicial actors.

Why It Matters:

* Challenging traditional assumptions about constitutional courts' impartiality.

* Offers important insights for scholars studying German politics, legal systems, and judicial behavior.