📌 The Problem
Migrants in rapidly urbanizing developing-country cities vote far less than local-born residents. Three potential explanations were tested: strong socioeconomic ties to origin regions, administrative hurdles to enrollment that hit newcomers harder, and political ostracism by antimigrant elites.
📍 Field Experiment: Door-to-Door Registration in Two Indian Cities
A randomized door-to-door drive directly assisted internal migrants to register to vote in two Indian cities. An additional treatment arm notified local politicians about the registration drive in a subset of localities. Outcomes tracked included local registration and turnout in the next election.
🔎 Hypotheses Tested
- Migrants’ socioeconomic links to origin regions reduce willingness to register locally.
- Bureaucratic enrollment obstacles disproportionately discourage newcomers from registering.
- Antimigrant politicians suppress migrant registration or ignore migrant voters.
✅ Key Findings
- Ties to origin regions do not predict migrants’ willingness to become registered locally.
- Direct assistance in navigating the electoral bureaucracy raised migrant registration by 24 percentage points and substantially increased turnout in the subsequent election.
- Informing politicians about the drive did not lead them to ignore new migrant voters; instead, elites amplified campaign efforts in response.
💡 Why It Matters
Onerous registration requirements are a major barrier to political incorporation and therefore to the well-being of migrant communities in fast-urbanizing settings. These results also have implications for policies aimed at assimilating naturalized but politically excluded cross-border immigrants.
