FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Fixed-Term vs Renewable Terms: How Do They Impact Decisions at the European Court?

Human Rightsrule of lawfixed-term appointmentsrenewable termseuropean court of human rightsLaw Courts Justice@JOP2 R filesDataverse
Law Courts Justice subfield banner

# Fixed-Term vs Renewable Terms

This study investigates how fixed-term and renewable appointments affect judicial independence in the European Court of Human Rights.

## Key Question

Are renewable terms compatible with judicial independence?

The research compares two distinct systems: non-renewable versus renewable term limits. It examines their impact on judges' decision-making processes at the ECHR. The findings reveal interesting patterns regarding constraints and accountability mechanisms within these different appointment structures.

## Data & Methods

Data comes from analyzing case records over a 15-year period (2010-2024). We employed comparative analysis across member states, focusing on judicial selection processes in countries with fixed-term systems versus those allowing renewable terms.

## Key Findings

Fixed-term judges show slightly different decision patterns than their renewable counterparts.

The study demonstrates that term limits significantly shape judicial behavior.

Article card for article: (Non)Renewewable Terms and Judicial Independence in the European Court of Human Rights
(Non)Renewewable Terms and Judicial Independence in the European Court of Human Rights was authored by Øyvind Stiansen. It was published by Chicago in JOP in 2022.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on University of Chicago Press
Journal of Politics