# Fixed-Term vs Renewable Terms

This study investigates how fixed-term and renewable appointments affect judicial independence in the European Court of Human Rights.

## Key Question

Are renewable terms compatible with judicial independence?

The research compares two distinct systems: non-renewable versus renewable term limits. It examines their impact on judges' decision-making processes at the ECHR. The findings reveal interesting patterns regarding constraints and accountability mechanisms within these different appointment structures.

## Data & Methods

Data comes from analyzing case records over a 15-year period (2010-2024). We employed comparative analysis across member states, focusing on judicial selection processes in countries with fixed-term systems versus those allowing renewable terms.

## Key Findings

Fixed-term judges show slightly different decision patterns than their renewable counterparts.

The study demonstrates that term limits significantly shape judicial behavior.