
Why Gender Quotas?
Melanie M. Hughes, Mona Lena Krook, and Pamela Paxton ask why gender quotas for legislative bodies spread so rapidly across the globe over the past few decades. Gender quotas are formal rules or party measures designed to increase women's representation in legislatures; understanding their diffusion sheds light on how international norms, transnational movements, and domestic politics interact to reshape who gets elected.
How the Authors Study It
The authors analyze quota adoption in 149 countries from 1989 to 2008 using event-history (survival) models to assess the timing and likelihood of countries adopting quotas. Their framework separates influences operating at three levels: global pressure, transnational organizing by the international women’s movement, and national-level political factors.
What They Find
Why It Matters
This study advances understanding of international norm diffusion by showing that transnational activism can be both a facilitator and a complicating force. Policies promoted at the global level do not simply cascade into national adoption; domestic organizational linkages and political reactions shape whether norms translate into institutional change. The findings matter for scholars of representation, social movements, and comparative politics, and for activists and policymakers seeking to design strategies that account for local political contexts.

| Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas was authored by Melanie M. Hughes, Mona Lena Krook and Pamela Paxton. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2015. |