FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Transnational Women's Activism Drives Quota Adoption, Yet Domestic Links Can Weaken Impact

Gender Quotastransnational womens activismSurvival Analysiswomens representationInternational Relations@ISQDataverse
International Relations subfield banner

Why Gender Quotas?

Melanie M. Hughes, Mona Lena Krook, and Pamela Paxton ask why gender quotas for legislative bodies spread so rapidly across the globe over the past few decades. Gender quotas are formal rules or party measures designed to increase women's representation in legislatures; understanding their diffusion sheds light on how international norms, transnational movements, and domestic politics interact to reshape who gets elected.

How the Authors Study It

The authors analyze quota adoption in 149 countries from 1989 to 2008 using event-history (survival) models to assess the timing and likelihood of countries adopting quotas. Their framework separates influences operating at three levels: global pressure, transnational organizing by the international women’s movement, and national-level political factors.

What They Find

  • Transnational women’s activism matters: connections to the international women’s movement increase the probability that a country will adopt a gender quota.
  • A nuanced interaction emerges: rising global pressure to adopt quotas does not uniformly strengthen quota adoption where domestic organizations have strong ties to transnational networks; instead, the effect of global pressure is weaker in those settings.
  • The authors propose two plausible explanations for this negative interaction: the diversity of agendas among women's organizations across networks, which can dilute coherent pressure, and potential elite backlash when women's mobilization is visible and perceived as threatening.

Why It Matters

This study advances understanding of international norm diffusion by showing that transnational activism can be both a facilitator and a complicating force. Policies promoted at the global level do not simply cascade into national adoption; domestic organizational linkages and political reactions shape whether norms translate into institutional change. The findings matter for scholars of representation, social movements, and comparative politics, and for activists and policymakers seeking to design strategies that account for local political contexts.

Article card for article: Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas
Transnational Women's Activism and the Global Diffusion of Gender Quotas was authored by Melanie M. Hughes, Mona Lena Krook and Pamela Paxton. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2015.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Oxford University Press
International Studies Quarterly