FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & CourtsđŸŽ”
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & CourtsđŸŽ”
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & CourtsđŸŽ”
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

The Kyoto Protocol: Two-Level Bargaining and European Integration

European Politics subfield banner

Article Abstract:
The politics of ratifying the Kyoto Protocol may suggest a two-level game; yet, our quantitative analysis shows that ratification constraints did not affect bargaining over the Protocol, nor did bargaining outcomes affect ratification. The politics of the Kyoto Protocol are best understood as an example of the ‘Europeanization’ of international politics: European countries subordinate their domestic politics to international cooperation, and the European Union emerges as a key agenda setter. We find that European countries ratified the Protocol in lock step and offered selective incentives—such as EU accession—to most of the participants. Case studies of Russia and Poland confirm our interpretation of the empirical findings.
Article card for article: The Kyoto Protocol: Two-Level Bargaining and European Integration
The Kyoto Protocol: Two-Level Bargaining and European Integration was authored by Elena V. McLean and Randall W. Stone. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2012.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Oxford University Press
International Studies Quarterly