FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

China’s Aid to Africa: Diplomacy Shapes Grants, Commerce Drives Loans

official development assistancechinese development financeafrican politicsForeign Policydevelopment loansAsian Politics@ISQ1 Stata file1 datasetDataverse
Asian Politics subfield banner

Why Distinguish ODA From Other Chinese Financing?

Chinese government financing in Africa attracts heated criticism—accusations range from buying political allies to securing resource access and locking out local firms. Axel Dreher, Andreas Fuchs, Brad Parks, Austin M. Strange, and Michael J. Tierney argue that much of this controversy stems from lumping together very different kinds of Chinese state finance. They stress the importance of separating concessional Official Development Assistance (ODA) from more commercial, less concessional financing to understand Beijing’s motives.

What the Authors Did

The authors assembled a new database of China’s official financing commitments to African countries covering 2000–2013. Using this resource, they analyze how different types of Chinese financing are distributed across recipient countries and investigate the factors that best explain those allocations.

Key Findings

  • Chinese ODA allocations are primarily associated with foreign policy considerations, consistent with diplomatic and political objectives.
  • Less concessional forms of state finance—loans and other commercial instruments—are better explained by economic interests, such as opportunities for trade, investment, or access to natural resources.

What This Means for Research and Policy

The paper shows that treating all Chinese flows as a single category obscures important variation in motives and likely impacts. The authors call for improved measurement and classification of non-Western development finance so scholars and policymakers can more accurately assess geopolitical and economic effects of China’s engagement in Africa.

Who Should Care

Scholars of international political economy, foreign policy analysts, and development practitioners will find the distinction between diplomatic and commercial drivers crucial for interpreting China’s role in Africa and for designing responses that reflect the diversity of Beijing’s financial tools.

Article card for article: Apples and Dragon Fruits: The Determinants of Aid and Other Forms of State Financing from China to Africa
Apples and Dragon Fruits: The Determinants of Aid and Other Forms of State Financing from China to Africa was authored by Axel Dreher, Andreas Fuchs, Brad Parks, Austin M Strange and Michael J Tierney. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Oxford University Press
International Studies Quarterly