
This study addresses how governments bring multiparty civil wars to an end by proposing a systems approach. Prior research often focused on either individual conflicts (civil war level) or specific dyadic terminations, overlooking the connections between group-level peace agreements. The analysis examines 264 dyadic terminations and reveals that reducing systemic fighting requires demonstrating Political Will & Capacity for comprehensive reforms while dealing with security issues.
✅ Key Findings:
💡 Why This Matters
This research provides a nuanced understanding of civil war termination strategies, emphasizing that successful resolution requires attention to systemic peacebuilding rather than focusing solely on individual group outcomes.

| One Dyadic Peace Leads to Another? Conflict Systems, Terminations, and Net Reduction in Fighting Groups was authored by Jason Quinn, Madhav Joshi and Erik Melander. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2019. |