FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Self-Reporting Matters: How International Regimes Influence Domestic Politics

Self ReportingInternational ComplianceDomestic PoliticsConvention Against TortureComparative PoliticsISQ6 R files10 DatasetsDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

New data reveals how international regulatory agreements impact domestic compliance through self-reporting mechanisms. This study examines the Convention Against Torture and demonstrates that submitting reports creates political pressure within states.

## Evidence & New Data

Researchers analyzed state reports submitted to the Committee Against Torture, creating a novel dataset tracking implementation patterns over time.

## How It Works

The process mobilizes domestic politics by:

  • Increasing civil society participation in shadow reporting activities
  • Generating media attention around human rights issues
  • Spurring legislative action related to torture prevention

This research provides the first systematic evaluation of self-reporting's political effects on human rights outcomes within treaty regimes. Findings offer crucial insights for understanding international compliance mechanisms, particularly relevant given that many treaties rely heavily on this approach.

Article card for article: Do Self-Reporting Regimes Matter? Evidence from the Convention Against Torture
Do Self-Reporting Regimes Matter? Evidence from the Convention Against Torture was authored by Cosette Creamer and Beth Simmons. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on OUP
International Studies Quarterly
Edit article record marker