FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Legitimacy Shapes International Institutional Change Through Cognitive Processes

International OrganizationsLegitimacyCognitive TheoryRegional ParliamentarizationSurvival Analysis MethodInternational Relations@ISQ2 Stata files1 datasetDataverse
International Relations subfield banner

Does legitimacy drive international institutional change? This article examines three causal mechanisms by which variation in legitimacy induces regional parliamentarization. Using survival analysis on a novel dataset of thirty-six regional organizations from 1950-2010, the authors find empowerment of supranational secretariats, proximity to the European Union, and neighborhood parliamentarization increase adoption rates. These results reveal that legitimacy judgments stem from cognitive referents—a previously overlooked source of institutional change.

The findings highlight a key mechanism behind these changes: cognitive emulation. Illustrating this with the case study of Southeast Asian Nations' parliamentarization process shows how member states mimic successful models based on perceived legitimacy.

Article card for article: Legitimacy and the Cognitive Sources of International Institutional Change: The Case of Regional Parliamentarization
Legitimacy and the Cognitive Sources of International Institutional Change: The Case of Regional Parliamentarization was authored by Tobias Lenz, Alexandr Burilkov and Lora Anne Viola. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Oxford University Press
International Studies Quarterly