FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Why Do Governments Restrict Civil Society After Treaty Ratification?

Comparative Politics subfield banner

Civil society mobilization and human rights treaty ratifications put pressure on governments. But this can backfire: committed governments may demobilize critics to avoid scrutiny.

➡️ Pressure from Below

When groups advocating for civil liberties mobilize, they signal government failures. Yet compliance with treaties doesn't guarantee improvement.

➡️ Government Response

Governments may restrict these same organizations to silence critics and avoid international costs of their own abuses.

➡️ Key Argument

This study shows that governments committed to human rights but also engaged in severe violations use repression against activists precisely because they are treaty signatories. This helps explain the gap between formal commitments and actual practices.

Article card for article: When States Crack Down on Human Rights Defenders
When States Crack Down on Human Rights Defenders was authored by Kristin Bakke, Neil Mitchell and Hannah Smidt. It was published by Oxford in ISQ in 2020.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Oxford University Press
International Studies Quarterly