FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

This Means Voters Choose Victorious Groups Despite Past Violence

Military PowerEl SalvadorSecurity VotingCompetence ClaimVoting and Elections@World Pol.1 Stata file4 datasetsDataverse
Voting and Elections subfield banner

### What's Known Before Now?

Postwar elections often feature parties linked to past violence.

### New Findings & Insights:

New cross-national data reveals that military strength at conflict's end is a key factor in electoral success for belligerents. This power disparity helps dominant groups claim peace credit, positioning them as competent security providers and appealing to undecided voters.

### Real-World Takeaways/Implications:

This study shows how voters' decisions can be influenced by a group's military dominance post-conflict, offsetting negative perceptions of past atrocities through perceived competence. This offers insights into political dynamics after periods of violence.

Article card for article: Voting for Victors: Why Violent Actors Win Postwar Elections
Voting for Victors: Why Violent Actors Win Postwar Elections was authored by Sarah Daly. It was published by Princeton in World Pol. in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Princeton
World Politics