FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Chinese vs. U.S. Aid in Africa: Do Different Approaches Boost Legitimacy?

International Relations subfield banner

### US & China Aid Compared

This study investigates whether foreign aid affects the perceived legitimacy of African states, comparing American and Chinese approaches.

Researchers theorize that different donor rules and principles influence state legitimacy differently across six countries. Liberia is analyzed via surveys, survey experiments, and behavioral games alongside Afrobarometer data from other nations.

### Key Findings

Little evidence suggests aid reduces state legitimacy perceptions On the contrary, legitimacy appears largely unaffected or potentially slightly enhanced by both US and Chinese aid programs.

### Why It Matters

Findings remain robust across multiple settings, levels of analysis, identification strategies, and measurement approaches. This signals that aid's micro-level impact on governance perception might be less problematic than previously thought.

Article card for article: Foreign Aid and State Legitimacy: Evidence on Chinese and US Aid to Africa from Surveys, Survey Experiments, and Behavioral Games
Foreign Aid and State Legitimacy: Evidence on Chinese and US Aid to Africa from Surveys, Survey Experiments, and Behavioral Games was authored by Robert Blair and Philip Roessler. It was published by Princeton in World Pol. in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Princeton
World Politics