NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Chinese vs. U.S. Aid in Africa: Do Different Approaches Boost Legitimacy?

US & China Aid Compared

This study investigates whether foreign aid affects the perceived legitimacy of African states, comparing American and Chinese approaches.

Researchers theorize that different donor rules and principles influence state legitimacy differently across six countries. Liberia is analyzed via surveys, survey experiments, and behavioral games alongside Afrobarometer data from other nations.

Key Findings

  • Little evidence suggests aid reduces state legitimacy perceptions * On the contrary, legitimacy appears largely unaffected or potentially slightly enhanced by both US and Chinese aid programs.

Why It Matters

Findings remain robust across multiple settings, levels of analysis, identification strategies, and measurement approaches. This signals that aid's micro-level impact on governance perception might be less problematic than previously thought.

World Politics
Foreign Aid and State Legitimacy: Evidence on Chinese and US Aid to Africa from Surveys, Survey Experiments, and Behavioral Games was authored by Robert Blair and Philip Roessler. It was published in World Pol. in 2021. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S004388712000026X
International Relations subfield banner