퉼
Understanding District-Level Variation in Maoist Violence
This article examines the puzzling variation among Indian districts regarding chronic Maoist violence. Why do some areas consistently experience intense conflict while others remain peaceful? The research offers a novel explanation tied to political party development. 퉼
The Core Argument: Subaltern Political Parties Crowd Out Armed Groups
Researchers propose that subaltern-led political parties play a crucial role in preventing armed Maoist organizations from establishing control. The stronger these parties' presence, the less likely chronic violence occurs subsequently. Key Findings & Data Insights
* Subaltern incorporation significantly influences district-level conflict dynamics
* Original data set (1967-2008) tracks both political party development and Maoist violence patterns
* Field research supports the theoretical argument 퉼
Implications for Political Science Research
This study contributes a unique party-based framework to civil war literature. It demonstrates how political institutionalization can crowd out armed organizations, offering insights applicable beyond India's specific context.
| Why Ethnic Subaltern-Led Parties Crowd Out Armed Organizations: Explaining Maoist Violence in India was authored by Kanchan Chandra and Omar Garcia-Ponce. It was published by Princeton in World Pol. in 2019. |
