Why Gendered Appeals Matter
Cindy D. Kam, Allison M. Archer, and John G. Geer investigate how campaign advertisements that explicitly target women influence viewers' emotions, attention, and reported vote choice. The paper addresses an important puzzle for scholars and practitioners: do group-based appeals—here, appeals framed around gender—change how citizens feel about, remember, think about, and ultimately respond to campaign messages?
Three 2012 Ads, Four Outcome Measures
The authors examine three campaign advertisements aired during the 2012 U.S. election cycle and analyze viewers' reported reactions. The focus is on four linked outcomes: emotional responses to the ads, self-reported memorability, cognitive engagement with the ad content, and the ads' persuasiveness for vote choice. Comparisons are drawn across women and men to reveal whether gendered appeals work differently for different audiences.
How Reactions Were Measured
- Emotional responses: affective reactions viewers reported after watching each ad.
- Memorability: whether respondents reported that an ad stuck with them.
- Cognitive engagement: indicators of how much respondents thought about or processed the ad's message.
- Persuasion: viewers' reports of whether the ad influenced their vote preferences.
What They Find
The analysis documents systematic differences in how men and women react to gender-based campaign appeals. Gendered appeals reliably shape emotional and cognitive responses, and those reactions are meaningfully related to how persuasive viewers report the ads to be. The relationship between emotion, attention, and persuasion is complex: emotional reactions and memorability do not translate uniformly into vote change, underscoring nuance in how targeted communications operate.
Why This Matters
This study refines theories of gender and campaigning by showing that the effects of group-based appeals are multidimensional—affecting feelings, memory, and cognition in distinct ways—and that these dimensions jointly condition persuasive impact. The findings contribute to the broader literature on strategic political communication and voter behavior by highlighting when and how appeals tailored to social groups can influence political outcomes.
