
Why This Study Matters
John Henderson asks whether education itself causes people to participate more in politics — specifically, whether increases in schooling led to higher voting in the American South. The question speaks directly to a long-running debate in political behavior: education and turnout are strongly correlated, but can that link be interpreted causally?
A Natural Experiment in Public Health
Henderson exploits the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission’s (RSC) anti-hookworm campaign in the early twentieth-century American South as a plausibly exogenous shock to schooling. The RSC’s efforts to diagnose and treat hookworm infection reduced a disease that had depressed school attendance, thereby expanding primary and secondary education in some places more than others.
Two Measures of RSC Intervention
This dual approach lets the author separate the presence of a public-health program from its intensity on the ground.
How the Analysis Works
Key Findings
What This Means for Political Science
The paper provides new historical and causal evidence that expanding access to education can increase voter participation. By leveraging a public-health intervention as an exogenous source of schooling variation and by applying careful matching methods, Henderson strengthens the case that the well-known education–participation correlation reflects a substantive, causal education effect rather than simple selection or confounding.

| Hookworm Eradication As a Natural Experiment for Schooling and Voting in the American South was authored by John Henderson. It was published by Springer in Pol. Behav. in 2018. |