FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Panel Data Reveals Prejudice Activation's Surprising Impact on 2016 Presidential Votes

Voting and Elections subfield banner

Introduction

Discover how prejudice activation influenced presidential voting in the U.S. during a pivotal election year.

Data & Methods

This study employs panel data from the 2016 U.S. Election, analyzing longitudinal responses to assess the relationship between prejudice triggers and voting behavior.

Key Findings

Contrary to expectations, activating prejudiced attitudes unexpectedly swayed voter choices toward specific candidates across diverse demographics.

Why It Matters

These findings offer fresh insights into how subtle biases can significantly impact election outcomes and challenge conventional campaign strategies.

Article card for article: The Activation of Prejudice and Presidential Voting: Panel Evidence from the 2016 U.S. Election
The Activation of Prejudice and Presidential Voting: Panel Evidence from the 2016 U.S. Election was authored by Daniel Hopkins. It was published by Springer in Pol. Behav. in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Springer
Political Behavior