Why Some Countries Joined the AIIB Early, Others Later

ChinaUS alliesUN voting patternsBelt_and_Road_InsightsInternational Relations @R&P 1 Stata file 1 dataset Dataverse

The rise of the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) presents a puzzle: why do states join an organization challenging U.S. dominance when they could wait? This paper argues that early members were politically distant from Washington, while later ones aligned with the United States or joined the existing ADB.

Political Distance

The study contends initial AIIB members sought to challenge American influence directly due to their limited ties—both internationally and domestically—with the U.S. These states reflect Beijing's explicit stance against established Western powers.

Later Membership Trends

Contrary patterns emerge for subsequent entrants:

Democratic governance is more common among late members

Existing ADB affiliates increase their chances of joining AIIB

Voting similarity at the UN GA correlates strongly with U.S.-aligned membership

Evidence from Logit Models

Using statistical analysis, this research tests these propositions against countries' responses to the 2014 Memorandum of Understanding governing AIIB formation. Findings reveal a clear shift away from democratic states in early commitments toward institutional alignment with U.S.-based systems.

Article card for article: Who Joins Counter-Hegemonic IGOs? Early and Late Members of the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank

Who Joins Counter-Hegemonic IGOs? Early and Late Members of the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank was authored by Vinicius Rodrigues Vieira. It was published by Sage in R&P in 2018.