
This study replicates and extends earlier work examining how natural disasters influence retrospective voting in gubernatorial elections. It demonstrates that leaders face heightened scrutiny during crises, with both challenges and opportunities for demonstrating competence.
Key Findings:
This research highlights the complex conditional relationship between voters and leaders during natural disasters. By analyzing gubernatorial election outcomes across different disaster scenarios, it provides insights into how political crises inform retrospective evaluations of incumbents.

| Weathering the Storm: Conditional Effects of Natural Disasters on Retrospective Voting in Gubernatorial Elections - a Replication and Extension was authored by Kevin Stout. It was published by Sage in R&P in 2018. |