FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Labeling Matters Less Than Thought? Dismantling Person-Positivity in Public Opinion Research

Person Positivity BiasTerminology EffectSocial Category LabelAttitudinal ObjectPolitical BehaviorR&P1 datasetDataverse
Political Behavior subfield banner

This study examines how terminology affects attitudes toward gays and lesbians.

Methodology: A survey experiment manipulated question wording with different descriptors (person vs sexuality construct) and terminology types (colloquial vs clinical). The analysis included feeling thermometer scores.

Key Findings: Respondents rated personal terms more positively than clinical ones, suggesting a person-positivity bias. However, despite using only clinical terminology, the study found evidence for this bias.

Implications: Survey researchers must consider wording effects on responses. Yet these impacts are not universal and generally smaller than differences based on social/political backgrounds.

Article card for article: Person-Positivity Bias, Social Category Labels, and Attitudes toward Gays and Lesbians
Person-Positivity Bias, Social Category Labels, and Attitudes toward Gays and Lesbians was authored by Katherine McCabe. It was published by Sage in R&P in 2019.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on Sage Journals
Rsearch & Politics
Edit article record marker