FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Divergent Paths: How Europe and the United States Differ in Regulating Uber

Comparative Politics subfield banner

This paper examines how different countries responded to Uber, a disruptive new service.

Uber as Comparative Lens: The research uses Uber's case to explore regulatory differences between two regions.

Contrasting Reactions: In the United States, Germany, and Sweden, responses ranged from welcoming and adapting regulations to outright bans. 📧

Country-Specific Flashpoints: Conflicts over Uber focused on different issues in each country.

Regulatory Consequences: These varying regulatory stances mobilized different actors, formed distinct coalitions, and shaped the conflict framing differently across countries.

Article card for article: Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States
Regulating Uber: The Politics of the Platform Economy in Europe and the United States was authored by Kathleen Thelen. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Perspectives on Politics