This paper examines how different countries responded to Uber, a disruptive new service.

Uber as Comparative Lens: The research uses Uber's case to explore regulatory differences between two regions.

Contrasting Reactions: In the United States, Germany, and Sweden, responses ranged from welcoming and adapting regulations to outright bans. 📧

Country-Specific Flashpoints: Conflicts over Uber focused on different issues in each country.

Regulatory Consequences: These varying regulatory stances mobilized different actors, formed distinct coalitions, and shaped the conflict framing differently across countries.