FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Beyond Counterterrorism: How CIA Collaboration Harms Authoritarian Human Rights Practices

covert collaborationauthoritarian countrieshuman rights deterrenceInternational Relations@POP4 R files7 datasetsDataverse
International Relations subfield banner

This study evaluates the broader consequences of the CIA's rendition, detention, and interrogation program during the war on terror. Rather than focusing solely on whether the program disrupted plots or saved American lives, we examine its impact on partner states' human rights records.

Covert Collaboration & Coerced Compliance

We demonstrate that authoritarian countries collaborating with the US intelligence agency saw worsening domestic human rights practices following involvement in secret detention programs. This finding illustrates a critical learning effect: security cooperation appears to coerce rather than persuade governments to adopt better human rights standards.

Policy Implications

This suggests policymakers must consider unintended geopolitical consequences when evaluating counterterrorism tools. The research highlights the importance of democratic institutions among partner states as safeguards against these negative repercussions.

Article card for article: Partners in Crime: An Empirical Evaluation of the CIA Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program
Partners in Crime: An Empirical Evaluation of the CIA Rendition, Detention, and Interrogation Program was authored by Averell Schmidt and Kathryn Sikkink. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2018.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on Cambridge University Press
Perspectives on Politics