FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Freedom House and press freedom restrictions weaken public opinion influence on policy

Press FreedomOpinion-Policy LinkQuantitative AnalysisComparative StudyComparative PoliticsPOP1 Stata fileDataverse
Comparative Politics subfield banner

This study explores how media freedoms impact the ability of citizens to effectively respond to government policies.

The research shows that when media outlets face restrictions, the connection between public opinion and government decisions becomes less robust.

Key Findings:

â–¶ Press freedom limitations correlate with decreased public responsiveness to policy

â–¶ This relationship demonstrates the essential role free press plays in representative democracy

Data & Methods:

â–¶ Analyzed Wave 4 data from Comparative Study of Electoral Systems survey

â–¶ Merged with OECD government spending information and Freedom House press freedom metrics

The findings suggest that unrestricted media are crucial for enabling citizens to meaningfully influence policy decisions.

Article card for article: Freedom of the Press and Public Responsiveness
Freedom of the Press and Public Responsiveness was authored by Stuart Soroka, Dan Hiashutter-Rice and Christopher Wlezien. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2021.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
Perspectives on Politics
Edit article record marker