Gender Parity in Political Science: Accountability vs Networked Bias

gender parityaccountability mechanismsservice rolesleadership advancementTeaching and Learning @POP 1 R file 2 Stata files 2 datasets Dataverse

This study investigates persistent gender disparities in status determination within American political science.

Key Findings:

Highest-status positions remain gender-skewed
Women are overrepresented in service-oriented roles (lower prestige)
"Leaning in" through leadership roles does not guarantee higher-status advancement
Accountability mechanisms promote greater gender parity

The Puzzle: Higher-status gaps despite increased representation in certain institutional roles?

Our analysis explores how different appointment systems shape gender outcomes. Institutions with centralized accountability processes show better gender balance, suggesting potential for policy change to address disciplinary recognition patterns. The findings raise important questions about the distribution of status and whether our reward structures adequately value contributions at all levels.

Article card for article: Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who Determines Whether a Scholar Is Noteworthy?

Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who Determines Whether a Scholar Is Noteworthy? was authored by Karen J. Alter, Jean Clipperton, Emily Schraudenbach and Laura Rozier. It was published by Cambridge in POP in 2020.