NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Gender Parity in Political Science: Accountability vs Networked Bias

Perspectives on Politics
Gender and Status in American Political Science: Who Determines Whether a Scholar Is Noteworthy? was authored by Karen J. Alter, Jean Clipperton, Emily Schraudenbach and Laura Rozier. It was published in POP in 2020. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S1537592719004985

This study investigates persistent gender disparities in status determination within American political science.

Key Findings:

  • Highest-status positions remain gender-skewed
  • Women are overrepresented in service-oriented roles (lower prestige)
  • "Leaning in" through leadership roles does not guarantee higher-status advancement
  • Accountability mechanisms promote greater gender parity

The Puzzle: Higher-status gaps despite increased representation in certain institutional roles?

Our analysis explores how different appointment systems shape gender outcomes. Institutions with centralized accountability processes show better gender balance, suggesting potential for policy change to address disciplinary recognition patterns. The findings raise important questions about the distribution of status and whether our reward structures adequately value contributions at all levels.

Teaching and Learning subfield banner