NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials of Poltical Analysis 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | R Companion 4e | SPSS 7e | Stata 5e | Excel 1e 🎵
NOW AVAILABLE: Essentials 7e | More Textbooks 🎵
If this link is broken, please
You can also
(will be reviewed).

Foreign Election Help Angers Americans More Than Interference Against Us

New Findings

New research reveals American public reactions to foreign electoral intervention through experiments. The study finds that even modest interventions polarize citizens along partisan lines.

Partisan Polarization

Americans condemn foreign involvement more when a power supports the opposition than when supporting their own party. This exposure also leads to greater loss of faith in democracy and increased calls for retaliation.

Rejection of Military Response

Interestingly, Americans reject military responses even when their own political party is targeted by electoral attacks on U.S., despite readily condemning similar actions against their opponents abroad.

Broader Implications

These findings suggest that foreign election interference can significantly divide adversaries and weaken democratic institutions without triggering the same public demand for conventional military retaliation seen in other contexts.

American Political Science Review
Public Opinion and Foreign Electoral Intervention was authored by Michael Tomz and Jessica L. P. Weeks. It was published in APSR in 2020. Find on Google Scholar10.1017/S0003055420000064
Political Behavior subfield banner