Scholars argue that effective deterrence requires a careful balance of military power and diplomatic behavior.
Research Methodology & Data:
* Analysis of fifty-eight historical cases through probit analysis.
* Focuses on conditions for extended vs. immediate deterrence success or failure.
Key Findings:
* Enhanced Deterrence: A defender's battlefield capability to prevent a swift victory strongly enhances deterrence credibility.
* Reciprocity Matters: Diplomatic and military reciprocity significantly contributes to successful deterrence outcomes.
* Past Behavior Predicts Future Outcomes: Defenders' previous records of yielding or being inflexible increase the likelihood of deterrence failure in crises.
Implications:
The study demonstrates that while military readiness builds trust, consistent policy behavior is crucial. A defender's past actions shape how allies (and adversaries) perceive their resolve.
| Extended Deterrence and the Outbreak of War was authored by Paul Huth. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 1988. |
