FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   ANALYZE DATA: Help with R | SPSS | Stata | Excel   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
   FIND DATA: By Journal | Sites   WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
WHAT'S NEW? US Politics | IR | Law & Courts🎵
If this link is broken, please report as broken. You can also submit updates (will be reviewed).

Timing Your Vote Matters: How Signals Drive Congressional Position Announcements

Strategic TimingSignaling TheoryNaftraCongressional AnnouncementsAmerican PoliticsAPSR1 datasetDataverse
American Politics subfield banner

Understanding when politicians announce their positions requires more than just knowing what they stand for. This research explores strategic timing decisions in Congress, specifically using data on House representatives' stance announcements regarding the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTRA). We develop a model suggesting early announcement favors those receiving clear signals from constituents, interest groups, and policy leaders, while conflicting signals lead members to delay, seeking more information before revealing their position. Our analysis contrasts this timing dynamic with traditional vote models, uncovering distinct factors influencing the "when" versus the final "vote" choice. This work illuminates the crucial role of timing in political decision-making.

Article card for article: The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement
The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress: A Study of the North American Free Trade Agreement was authored by Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Laura W. Arnold and Christopher J.W. Zorn. It was published by Cambridge in APSR in 1997.
Find on Google Scholar
Find on JSTOR
Find on CUP
American Political Science Review
Edit article record marker